ABSTRACT
Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is an unpredictable serious adverse drug reaction, which only occurs in a minority of special susceptible individuals. Although the mechanism of IDILI has not been fully understood, several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the action mode and specific mechanism of IDILI. Of these hypotheses, inflammatory stress hypothesis is one of the most important theories. Under the condition of inflammatory stress, drugs interact with inflammation and mediate the occurrence of IDILI through a variety of mechanisms, which can induce the production of inflammatory cytokines, activate coagulation system, affect the activity of metabolites, induce cholestasis, affect mitochondrial damage, and others. This review will summarize the main mechanisms and influencing factors of IDILI mediated by inflammatory stress, in order to provide a reference for preclinical drug development and basic research on drug-induced liver injury.
ABSTRACT
The combined use of batifiban, a synthetic platelet GPII b/ IIIa receptor antagonist, and antithrombin agents is an attractive option for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. To observe whether antithrombin agents affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of batifiban in combination therapy and optimize clinical administration dosage of batifiban, an open-label and parallel study was conducted. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly divided into three groups, which were sequentially treated with batifiban alone, or oral coadministration of clopidogrel, aspirin and UFH, or batifiban coadministered with these antithrombin agents. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points. The evaluation index included the inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of batifiban and batifiban coadministered with antithrombin agents showed no significant differences. The mean inhibition rate of platelet aggregation (%) suggested that neither batifiban alone nor antithrombin agents alone could provide such potent inhibition rate (>80%) to obtain the best clinical efficacy, but they had a synergistic effect on platelet inhibition. No serious adverse effects were observed. The results in these healthy subjects suggest that batifiban coadministrated with antithrombin agents could achieve optimum clinical treatment effect for patients with NSTE ACS, and also those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention.
ABSTRACT
The combined use of batifiban, a synthetic platelet GPII b/ IIIa receptor antagonist, and antithrombin agents is an attractive option for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. To observe whether antithrombin agents affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of batifiban in combination therapy and optimize clinical administration dosage of batifiban, an open-label and parallel study was conducted. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly divided into three groups, which were sequentially treated with batifiban alone, or oral coadministration of clopidogrel, aspirin and UFH, or batifiban coadministered with these antithrombin agents. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points. The evaluation index included the inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of batifiban and batifiban coadministered with antithrombin agents showed no significant differences. The mean inhibition rate of platelet aggregation (%) suggested that neither batifiban alone nor antithrombin agents alone could provide such potent inhibition rate (>80%) to obtain the best clinical efficacy, but they had a synergistic effect on platelet inhibition. No serious adverse effects were observed. The results in these healthy subjects suggest that batifiban coadministrated with antithrombin agents could achieve optimum clinical treatment effect for patients with NSTE ACS, and also those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention.